We do love open source and have an opportunity to make it better from now.
Pleo vs Semrush
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Pleo and Semrush (We do love open source and have an opportunity to make it better from now.) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Semrush (rank #317) holds a modest lead over Pleo (rank #625) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (44 vs 33). The gap of 11 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Semrush is ahead of Pleo. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Semrush is clearly ahead of Pleo. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Pleo is clearly ahead of Semrush.
Pleo carries 36 GitHub stars across 34 public repos, with 5 repositories active in the last 90 days and 8 external contributors on record. Semrush shows 454 stars across 11 public repos, 2 active in the last 90 days and 7 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Semrush's footprint is roughly 12.6x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.
Pleo is the stronger read for anyone weighting momentum. Semrush looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Pleo | Semrush |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #625 | #317 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 33 | 44 |
| Code | 44 | 44 |
| Education | 65 | 65 |
| Community | 20 | 36 |
| Reach | 11 | 35 |
| Momentum | 76 | 37 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 36 | 454 |
| Forks | 75 | 124 |
| Public repos | 34 | 11 |
| Active repos (90d) | 5 | 2 |
| External contributors | 8 | 7 |
| Avg polish | 45 | 48 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 26 | 32 |