Podium vs Zammad
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Podium and Zammad both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Zammad (rank #152) holds a modest lead over Podium (rank #372) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (52 vs 42). The gap of 10 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Podium is slightly ahead of Zammad. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Zammad is clearly ahead of Podium. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Podium is clearly ahead of Zammad. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Zammad is clearly ahead of Podium.
Podium carries 86 GitHub stars across 25 public repos, with 7 repositories active in the last 90 days and 3 external contributors on record. Zammad shows 6,394 stars across 11 public repos, 9 active in the last 90 days and 27 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Zammad's footprint is roughly 74.3x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.
Podium is the stronger read for anyone weighting reach. Zammad looks better where community is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Podium | Zammad |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #372 | #152 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 42 | 52 |
| Code | 63 | 63 |
| Education | 72 | 71 |
| Community | 16 | 70 |
| Reach | 59 | 0 |
| Momentum | 15 | 39 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 86 | 6,394 |
| Forks | 75 | 1,687 |
| Public repos | 25 | 11 |
| Active repos (90d) | 7 | 9 |
| External contributors | 3 | 27 |
| Avg polish | 61 | 71 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 37 | 35 |