PostHog vs Zammad

PostHog (The single platform to analyze, test, observe, and deploy new features) and Zammad both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

PostHog (rank #32) holds a modest lead over Zammad (rank #152) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (63 vs 52). The gap of 11 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), PostHog is ahead of Zammad. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Zammad is ahead of PostHog. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Zammad is ahead of PostHog. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), PostHog is clearly ahead of Zammad. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), PostHog is clearly ahead of Zammad.

PostHog carries 40,819 GitHub stars across 357 public repos, with 87 repositories active in the last 90 days and 210 external contributors on record. Zammad shows 6,394 stars across 11 public repos, 9 active in the last 90 days and 27 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but PostHog's footprint is roughly 6.4x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

PostHog is the stronger read for anyone weighting momentum. Zammad looks better where community is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.