Proton Mail vs Sage
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Proton Mail and Sage both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Proton Mail (rank #401) holds a narrow lead over Sage (rank #625) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (41 vs 33). The gap of 8 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Proton Mail is slightly ahead of Sage. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Sage is ahead of Proton Mail. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Proton Mail is ahead of Sage. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Proton Mail is clearly ahead of Sage. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Proton Mail is clearly ahead of Sage.
Proton Mail carries 16,265 GitHub stars across 186 public repos, with 19 repositories active in the last 90 days and 20 external contributors on record. Sage shows 2,180 stars across 122 public repos, 6 active in the last 90 days and 22 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Proton Mail's footprint is roughly 7.5x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.
Proton Mail is the stronger read for anyone weighting momentum. Sage looks better where education is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Proton Mail | Sage |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #401 | #625 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 41 | 33 |
| Code | 64 | 56 |
| Education | 42 | 52 |
| Community | 46 | 34 |
| Reach | 44 | 23 |
| Momentum | 52 | 12 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 16,265 | 2,180 |
| Forks | 2,240 | 430 |
| Public repos | 186 | 122 |
| Active repos (90d) | 19 | 6 |
| External contributors | 20 | 22 |
| Avg polish | 74 | 52 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 32 | 38 |