Remote helps with international payroll, benefits, taxes, stock options, and compliance for businesses big and small!
Qonto vs Remote
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Qonto and Remote (Remote helps with international payroll, benefits, taxes, stock options, and compliance for businesses big and small!) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Remote (rank #278) holds a narrow lead over Qonto (rank #338) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (46 vs 43). The gap of 3 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Qonto is slightly ahead of Remote. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Remote is slightly ahead of Qonto. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Remote is ahead of Qonto. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Qonto is slightly ahead of Remote. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Remote is clearly ahead of Qonto.
Qonto carries 501 GitHub stars across 75 public repos, with 11 repositories active in the last 90 days and 5 external contributors on record. Remote shows 811 stars across 51 public repos, 17 active in the last 90 days and 21 external contributors.
Qonto is the stronger read for anyone weighting code quality. Remote looks better where momentum is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Qonto | Remote |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #338 | #278 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 43 | 46 |
| Code | 57 | 51 |
| Education | 75 | 80 |
| Community | 25 | 34 |
| Reach | 24 | 20 |
| Momentum | 21 | 43 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 501 | 811 |
| Forks | 158 | 97 |
| Public repos | 75 | 51 |
| Active repos (90d) | 11 | 17 |
| External contributors | 5 | 21 |
| Avg polish | 62 | 44 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 36 | 40 |