Developer ecosystem comparison
vs

Qonto vs Semrush

Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.

Qonto and Semrush (We do love open source and have an opportunity to make it better from now.) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Semrush (rank #317) holds a narrow lead over Qonto (rank #338) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (44 vs 43). The gap of 1 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Qonto is ahead of Semrush. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Qonto is ahead of Semrush. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Semrush is ahead of Qonto. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Semrush is ahead of Qonto. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Semrush is ahead of Qonto.

Qonto carries 501 GitHub stars across 75 public repos, with 11 repositories active in the last 90 days and 5 external contributors on record. Semrush shows 454 stars across 11 public repos, 2 active in the last 90 days and 7 external contributors.

Qonto is the stronger read for anyone weighting code quality. Semrush looks better where momentum is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.

Side-by-side metrics

MetricQontoSemrush
Ranking
Overall rank#338#317
Pillars
Overall4344
Code5744
Education7565
Community2536
Reach2435
Momentum2137
Builder experience00
Signals
Stars501454
Forks158124
Public repos7511
Active repos (90d)112
External contributors57
Avg polish6248
Avg AI-readiness3632

Fork ecosystems

Loading fork ecosystem…
Loading fork ecosystem…
View Qonto developer profileView Semrush developer profile