We do love open source and have an opportunity to make it better from now.
Qonto vs Semrush
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Qonto and Semrush (We do love open source and have an opportunity to make it better from now.) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Semrush (rank #317) holds a narrow lead over Qonto (rank #338) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (44 vs 43). The gap of 1 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Qonto is ahead of Semrush. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Qonto is ahead of Semrush. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Semrush is ahead of Qonto. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Semrush is ahead of Qonto. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Semrush is ahead of Qonto.
Qonto carries 501 GitHub stars across 75 public repos, with 11 repositories active in the last 90 days and 5 external contributors on record. Semrush shows 454 stars across 11 public repos, 2 active in the last 90 days and 7 external contributors.
Qonto is the stronger read for anyone weighting code quality. Semrush looks better where momentum is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Qonto | Semrush |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #338 | #317 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 43 | 44 |
| Code | 57 | 44 |
| Education | 75 | 65 |
| Community | 25 | 36 |
| Reach | 24 | 35 |
| Momentum | 21 | 37 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 501 | 454 |
| Forks | 158 | 124 |
| Public repos | 75 | 11 |
| Active repos (90d) | 11 | 2 |
| External contributors | 5 | 7 |
| Avg polish | 62 | 48 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 36 | 32 |