Developer ecosystem comparison
vs

Qonto vs Spreedly

Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.

Qonto and Spreedly (Simple and secure PCI compliance and payment forwarding.) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Qonto (rank #338) holds a modest lead over Spreedly (rank #728) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (43 vs 30). The gap of 13 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Qonto is slightly ahead of Spreedly. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Qonto is clearly ahead of Spreedly. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Qonto is slightly ahead of Spreedly. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Spreedly is ahead of Qonto. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Qonto is slightly ahead of Spreedly.

Qonto carries 501 GitHub stars across 75 public repos, with 11 repositories active in the last 90 days and 5 external contributors on record. Spreedly shows 418 stars across 67 public repos, 10 active in the last 90 days and 2 external contributors.

Qonto is the stronger read for anyone weighting education. Spreedly looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.

Side-by-side metrics

MetricQontoSpreedly
Ranking
Overall rank#338#728
Pillars
Overall4330
Code5750
Education7550
Community2519
Reach2440
Momentum2119
Builder experience00
Signals
Stars501418
Forks158286
Public repos7567
Active repos (90d)1110
External contributors52
Avg polish6248
Avg AI-readiness3630

Fork ecosystems

Loading fork ecosystem…
Loading fork ecosystem…
View Qonto developer profileView Spreedly developer profile