Qonto vs Teamwork.com

Qonto and Teamwork.com (World-class products that work together to streamline your business. We're hiring!) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Teamwork.com (rank #237) holds a narrow lead over Qonto (rank #338) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (48 vs 43). The gap of 5 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Teamwork.com is slightly ahead of Qonto. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Qonto is ahead of Teamwork.com. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Teamwork.com is ahead of Qonto. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Teamwork.com is clearly ahead of Qonto. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Teamwork.com is slightly ahead of Qonto.

Qonto carries 501 GitHub stars across 75 public repos, with 11 repositories active in the last 90 days and 5 external contributors on record. Teamwork.com shows 2,108 stars across 123 public repos, 14 active in the last 90 days and 13 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Teamwork.com's footprint is roughly 4.2x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

Qonto is the stronger read for anyone weighting education. Teamwork.com looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.