Qonto vs Trade Republic
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Qonto and Trade Republic both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Qonto (rank #338) holds a narrow lead over Trade Republic (rank #485) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (43 vs 38). The gap of 5 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Qonto is ahead of Trade Republic. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Trade Republic is ahead of Qonto. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Trade Republic is slightly ahead of Qonto. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Trade Republic is ahead of Qonto. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Trade Republic is slightly ahead of Qonto.
Qonto carries 501 GitHub stars across 75 public repos, with 11 repositories active in the last 90 days and 5 external contributors on record. Trade Republic shows 1,245 stars across 2 public repos, 1 active in the last 90 days and 2 external contributors.
Qonto is the stronger read for anyone weighting code quality. Trade Republic looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Qonto | Trade Republic |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #338 | #485 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 43 | 38 |
| Code | 57 | 47 |
| Education | 75 | 85 |
| Community | 25 | 28 |
| Reach | 24 | 37 |
| Momentum | 21 | 24 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 501 | 1,245 |
| Forks | 158 | 42 |
| Public repos | 75 | 2 |
| Active repos (90d) | 11 | 1 |
| External contributors | 5 | 2 |
| Avg polish | 62 | 55 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 36 | 44 |