Developer ecosystem comparison
vs

Qonto vs Typeform

Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.

Qonto and Typeform both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Typeform (rank #189) holds a narrow lead over Qonto (rank #338) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (50 vs 43). The gap of 7 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Typeform is ahead of Qonto. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Qonto is clearly ahead of Typeform. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Typeform is ahead of Qonto. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Typeform is ahead of Qonto.

Qonto carries 501 GitHub stars across 75 public repos, with 11 repositories active in the last 90 days and 5 external contributors on record. Typeform shows 590 stars across 40 public repos, 8 active in the last 90 days and 5 external contributors.

Qonto is the stronger read for anyone weighting education. Typeform looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.

Side-by-side metrics

MetricQontoTypeform
Ranking
Overall rank#338#189
Pillars
Overall4350
Code5771
Education7551
Community2525
Reach2443
Momentum2131
Builder experience00
Signals
Stars501590
Forks158254
Public repos7540
Active repos (90d)118
External contributors55
Avg polish6275
Avg AI-readiness3638

Fork ecosystems

Loading fork ecosystem…
Loading fork ecosystem…
View Qonto developer profileView Typeform developer profile