Qonto vs UserTesting

Qonto and UserTesting (Real. Human. Insight.) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Qonto (rank #336) holds a modest lead over UserTesting (rank #692) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (43 vs 31). The gap of 12 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Qonto is ahead of UserTesting. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Qonto is ahead of UserTesting. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Qonto is ahead of UserTesting. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), UserTesting is ahead of Qonto. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Qonto is clearly ahead of UserTesting.

Qonto carries 501 GitHub stars across 75 public repos, with 11 repositories active in the last 90 days and 5 external contributors on record. UserTesting shows 15 stars across 119 public repos, 0 active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Qonto's footprint is roughly 33.4x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

Qonto is the stronger read for anyone weighting momentum. UserTesting looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.