Welcome to the Wrike TechClub open source community. Let's make tech world better together! NB: members must have two-factor auth.
Qonto vs Wrike
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Qonto and Wrike (Welcome to the Wrike TechClub open source community. Let's make tech world better together! NB: members must have two-factor auth.) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Qonto (rank #338) holds a modest lead over Wrike (rank #602) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (43 vs 34). The gap of 9 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Qonto is slightly ahead of Wrike. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Wrike is slightly ahead of Qonto. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Qonto is ahead of Wrike. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Qonto is ahead of Wrike. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Wrike is ahead of Qonto.
Qonto carries 501 GitHub stars across 75 public repos, with 11 repositories active in the last 90 days and 5 external contributors on record. Wrike shows 276 stars across 33 public repos, 1 active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors.
Qonto is the stronger read for anyone weighting community. Wrike looks better where momentum is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Qonto | Wrike |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #338 | #602 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 43 | 34 |
| Code | 57 | 49 |
| Education | 75 | 77 |
| Community | 25 | 11 |
| Reach | 24 | 15 |
| Momentum | 21 | 30 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 501 | 276 |
| Forks | 158 | 61 |
| Public repos | 75 | 33 |
| Active repos (90d) | 11 | 1 |
| External contributors | 5 | 0 |
| Avg polish | 62 | 48 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 36 | 30 |