Qualtrics vs Sprout Social

Qualtrics and Sprout Social both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Sprout Social (rank #401) holds a modest lead over Qualtrics (rank #693) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (41 vs 31). The gap of 10 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Sprout Social is clearly ahead of Qualtrics. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Sprout Social is ahead of Qualtrics. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Sprout Social is slightly ahead of Qualtrics. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Qualtrics is clearly ahead of Sprout Social. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Sprout Social is clearly ahead of Qualtrics.

Qualtrics carries 20 GitHub stars across 20 public repos, with 7 repositories active in the last 90 days and 3 external contributors on record. Sprout Social shows 313 stars across 68 public repos, 4 active in the last 90 days and 3 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Sprout Social's footprint is roughly 15.7x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

Qualtrics is the stronger read for anyone weighting reach. Sprout Social looks better where momentum is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.