Qualtrics vs Userlike
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Qualtrics and Userlike both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Userlike (rank #569) holds a narrow lead over Qualtrics (rank #693) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (35 vs 31). The gap of 4 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Userlike is ahead of Qualtrics. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Userlike is clearly ahead of Qualtrics. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Qualtrics is slightly ahead of Userlike. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Qualtrics is clearly ahead of Userlike. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Qualtrics is slightly ahead of Userlike.
Qualtrics carries 20 GitHub stars across 20 public repos, with 7 repositories active in the last 90 days and 3 external contributors on record. Userlike shows 38 stars across 14 public repos, 3 active in the last 90 days and 3 external contributors.
Qualtrics is the stronger read for anyone weighting reach. Userlike looks better where education is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Qualtrics | Userlike |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #693 | #569 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 31 | 35 |
| Code | 27 | 43 |
| Education | 40 | 85 |
| Community | 14 | 12 |
| Reach | 82 | 20 |
| Momentum | 18 | 12 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 20 | 38 |
| Forks | 13 | 5 |
| Public repos | 20 | 14 |
| Active repos (90d) | 7 | 3 |
| External contributors | 3 | 3 |
| Avg polish | 28 | 36 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 19 | 35 |