Razorpay vs Revolut
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Razorpay and Revolut (Revolut Open Source) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Razorpay (rank #30) holds a meaningful lead over Revolut (rank #693) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (63 vs 31). The gap of 32 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Razorpay is clearly ahead of Revolut. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Razorpay is slightly ahead of Revolut. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Razorpay is ahead of Revolut. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Razorpay is ahead of Revolut. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Razorpay is clearly ahead of Revolut.
Razorpay carries 3,811 GitHub stars across 177 public repos, with 38 repositories active in the last 90 days and 32 external contributors on record. Revolut shows 260 stars across 35 public repos, 5 active in the last 90 days and 1 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Razorpay's footprint is roughly 14.7x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.
Razorpay is the stronger read for anyone weighting momentum. Revolut makes more sense for teams already using its adjacent tools. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Razorpay | Revolut |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #30 | #693 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 63 | 31 |
| Code | 68 | 40 |
| Education | 53 | 52 |
| Community | 44 | 26 |
| Reach | 58 | 40 |
| Momentum | 71 | 20 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 3,811 | 260 |
| Forks | 1,932 | 142 |
| Public repos | 177 | 35 |
| Active repos (90d) | 38 | 5 |
| External contributors | 32 | 1 |
| Avg polish | 69 | 38 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 49 | 29 |