Razorpay vs Skyscanner

Razorpay and Skyscanner both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Razorpay (rank #30) holds a modest lead over Skyscanner (rank #209) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (63 vs 49). The gap of 14 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Razorpay is slightly ahead of Skyscanner. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Skyscanner is ahead of Razorpay. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Razorpay is slightly ahead of Skyscanner. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Razorpay is clearly ahead of Skyscanner. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Razorpay is clearly ahead of Skyscanner.

Razorpay carries 3,811 GitHub stars across 177 public repos, with 38 repositories active in the last 90 days and 32 external contributors on record. Skyscanner shows 8,167 stars across 86 public repos, 18 active in the last 90 days and 39 external contributors.

Razorpay is the stronger read for anyone weighting momentum. Skyscanner looks better where education is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.