Razorpay vs SlackAPI
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Razorpay and SlackAPI (https://docs.slack.dev/tools) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Razorpay (rank #30) holds a narrow lead over SlackAPI (rank #46) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (63 vs 61). The gap of 2 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), SlackAPI is ahead of Razorpay. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), SlackAPI is slightly ahead of Razorpay. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Razorpay is slightly ahead of SlackAPI. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Razorpay is clearly ahead of SlackAPI. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), SlackAPI is slightly ahead of Razorpay.
Razorpay carries 3,812 GitHub stars across 177 public repos, with 38 repositories active in the last 90 days and 33 external contributors on record. SlackAPI shows 17,894 stars across 37 public repos, 19 active in the last 90 days and 39 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but SlackAPI's footprint is roughly 4.7x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.
Razorpay is the stronger read for anyone weighting reach. SlackAPI looks better where code quality is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Razorpay | SlackAPI |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #30 | #46 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 63 | 61 |
| Code | 68 | 85 |
| Education | 53 | 58 |
| Community | 44 | 42 |
| Reach | 58 | 6 |
| Momentum | 71 | 76 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 3,812 | 17,894 |
| Forks | 1,929 | 3,838 |
| Public repos | 177 | 37 |
| Active repos (90d) | 38 | 19 |
| External contributors | 33 | 39 |
| Avg polish | 69 | 90 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 49 | 55 |