Razorpay vs Typeform

Razorpay and Typeform both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Razorpay (rank #30) holds a modest lead over Typeform (rank #189) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (63 vs 50). The gap of 13 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Typeform is slightly ahead of Razorpay. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Razorpay is slightly ahead of Typeform. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Razorpay is ahead of Typeform. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Razorpay is ahead of Typeform. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Razorpay is clearly ahead of Typeform.

Razorpay carries 3,811 GitHub stars across 177 public repos, with 38 repositories active in the last 90 days and 32 external contributors on record. Typeform shows 590 stars across 40 public repos, 8 active in the last 90 days and 5 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Razorpay's footprint is roughly 6.5x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

Razorpay is the stronger read for anyone weighting momentum. Typeform looks better where code quality is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.