Building the internet's open library of freely usable visuals. Join us 👫
Razorpay vs Unsplash
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Razorpay and Unsplash (Building the internet's open library of freely usable visuals. Join us 👫) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Razorpay (rank #30) holds a modest lead over Unsplash (rank #338) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (63 vs 43). The gap of 20 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Razorpay is ahead of Unsplash. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Unsplash is ahead of Razorpay. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Razorpay is ahead of Unsplash. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Razorpay is ahead of Unsplash. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Razorpay is clearly ahead of Unsplash.
Razorpay carries 3,812 GitHub stars across 177 public repos, with 38 repositories active in the last 90 days and 33 external contributors on record. Unsplash shows 9,930 stars across 63 public repos, 3 active in the last 90 days and 3 external contributors.
Razorpay is the stronger read for anyone weighting momentum. Unsplash looks better where education is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Razorpay | Unsplash |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #30 | #338 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 63 | 43 |
| Code | 68 | 56 |
| Education | 53 | 72 |
| Community | 44 | 33 |
| Reach | 58 | 40 |
| Momentum | 71 | 34 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 3,812 | 9,930 |
| Forks | 1,929 | 829 |
| Public repos | 177 | 63 |
| Active repos (90d) | 38 | 3 |
| External contributors | 33 | 3 |
| Avg polish | 69 | 60 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 49 | 38 |