Razorpay vs UptimeRobot
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Razorpay and UptimeRobot (Leading Uptime Monitoring Service) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Razorpay (rank #30) holds a meaningful lead over UptimeRobot (rank #510) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (63 vs 37). The gap of 26 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Razorpay is clearly ahead of UptimeRobot. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), UptimeRobot is ahead of Razorpay. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Razorpay is ahead of UptimeRobot. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Razorpay is clearly ahead of UptimeRobot. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Razorpay is ahead of UptimeRobot.
Razorpay carries 3,811 GitHub stars across 177 public repos, with 38 repositories active in the last 90 days and 32 external contributors on record. UptimeRobot shows 81 stars across 9 public repos, 6 active in the last 90 days and 10 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Razorpay's footprint is roughly 47.0x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.
Razorpay is the stronger read for anyone weighting code quality. UptimeRobot looks better where education is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Razorpay | UptimeRobot |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #30 | #510 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 63 | 37 |
| Code | 68 | 38 |
| Education | 53 | 62 |
| Community | 44 | 35 |
| Reach | 58 | 28 |
| Momentum | 71 | 52 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 3,811 | 81 |
| Forks | 1,932 | 24 |
| Public repos | 177 | 9 |
| Active repos (90d) | 38 | 6 |
| External contributors | 32 | 10 |
| Avg polish | 69 | 39 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 49 | 37 |