Razorpay vs Userlike
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Razorpay and Userlike both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Razorpay (rank #30) holds a meaningful lead over Userlike (rank #569) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (63 vs 35). The gap of 28 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Razorpay is clearly ahead of Userlike. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Userlike is clearly ahead of Razorpay. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Razorpay is clearly ahead of Userlike. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Razorpay is clearly ahead of Userlike. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Razorpay is clearly ahead of Userlike.
Razorpay carries 3,811 GitHub stars across 177 public repos, with 38 repositories active in the last 90 days and 32 external contributors on record. Userlike shows 38 stars across 14 public repos, 3 active in the last 90 days and 3 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Razorpay's footprint is roughly 100.3x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.
Razorpay is the stronger read for anyone weighting momentum. Userlike looks better where education is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Razorpay | Userlike |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #30 | #569 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 63 | 35 |
| Code | 68 | 43 |
| Education | 53 | 85 |
| Community | 44 | 12 |
| Reach | 58 | 20 |
| Momentum | 71 | 12 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 3,811 | 38 |
| Forks | 1,932 | 5 |
| Public repos | 177 | 14 |
| Active repos (90d) | 38 | 3 |
| External contributors | 32 | 3 |
| Avg polish | 69 | 36 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 49 | 35 |