Razorpay vs Vimeo
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Razorpay and Vimeo (You know, for videos.) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Razorpay (rank #31) holds a modest lead over Vimeo (rank #209) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (63 vs 49). The gap of 14 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Razorpay is slightly ahead of Vimeo. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Razorpay is slightly ahead of Vimeo. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Vimeo is slightly ahead of Razorpay. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Razorpay is clearly ahead of Vimeo. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Razorpay is ahead of Vimeo.
Razorpay carries 3,812 GitHub stars across 177 public repos, with 38 repositories active in the last 90 days and 33 external contributors on record. Vimeo shows 14,779 stars across 105 public repos, 19 active in the last 90 days and 19 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Vimeo's footprint is roughly 3.9x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.
Razorpay is the stronger read for anyone weighting reach. Vimeo looks better where community is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Razorpay | Vimeo |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #31 | #209 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 63 | 49 |
| Code | 68 | 63 |
| Education | 53 | 50 |
| Community | 44 | 45 |
| Reach | 58 | 19 |
| Momentum | 71 | 60 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 3,812 | 14,779 |
| Forks | 1,929 | 3,071 |
| Public repos | 177 | 105 |
| Active repos (90d) | 38 | 19 |
| External contributors | 33 | 19 |
| Avg polish | 69 | 67 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 49 | 38 |