Razorpay vs Webflow

Razorpay and Webflow (Webflow is the way to design, build, and launch powerful websites visually - without coding.) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Razorpay (rank #32) holds a modest lead over Webflow (rank #122) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (63 vs 54). The gap of 9 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Razorpay is clearly ahead of Webflow. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Webflow is clearly ahead of Razorpay. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Razorpay is ahead of Webflow. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Razorpay is slightly ahead of Webflow. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Razorpay is clearly ahead of Webflow.

Razorpay carries 3,812 GitHub stars across 177 public repos, with 38 repositories active in the last 90 days and 33 external contributors on record. Webflow shows 735 stars across 52 public repos, 9 active in the last 90 days and 16 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Razorpay's footprint is roughly 5.2x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

Razorpay is the stronger read for anyone weighting momentum. Webflow looks better where education is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.