Razorpay vs Wrike

Razorpay and Wrike (Welcome to the Wrike TechClub open source community. Let's make tech world better together! NB: members must have two-factor auth.) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Razorpay (rank #30) holds a meaningful lead over Wrike (rank #602) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (63 vs 34). The gap of 29 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Razorpay is ahead of Wrike. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Wrike is clearly ahead of Razorpay. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Razorpay is clearly ahead of Wrike. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Razorpay is clearly ahead of Wrike. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Razorpay is clearly ahead of Wrike.

Razorpay carries 3,811 GitHub stars across 177 public repos, with 38 repositories active in the last 90 days and 32 external contributors on record. Wrike shows 276 stars across 33 public repos, 1 active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Razorpay's footprint is roughly 13.8x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

Razorpay is the stronger read for anyone weighting reach. Wrike looks better where education is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.