Interactive developer hubs that help users succeed with your APIs 🦉
ReadMe vs RingCentral, Inc.
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
ReadMe (Interactive developer hubs that help users succeed with your APIs 🦉) and RingCentral, Inc. both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
ReadMe (rank #257) holds a narrow lead over RingCentral, Inc. (rank #372) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (47 vs 42). The gap of 5 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), ReadMe is ahead of RingCentral, Inc. . On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), ReadMe is clearly ahead of RingCentral, Inc. . On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), ReadMe is slightly ahead of RingCentral, Inc. . On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), ReadMe is slightly ahead of RingCentral, Inc. . On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), ReadMe is ahead of RingCentral, Inc. .
ReadMe carries 1,824 GitHub stars across 106 public repos, with 26 repositories active in the last 90 days and 21 external contributors on record. RingCentral, Inc. shows 1,659 stars across 184 public repos, 31 active in the last 90 days and 17 external contributors.
ReadMe is the stronger read for anyone weighting education. RingCentral, Inc. makes more sense for teams already using its adjacent tools. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | ReadMe | RingCentral, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #257 | #372 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 47 | 42 |
| Code | 76 | 59 |
| Education | 79 | 52 |
| Community | 43 | 42 |
| Reach | 26 | 23 |
| Momentum | 48 | 39 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 1,824 | 1,659 |
| Forks | 451 | 23,722 |
| Public repos | 106 | 184 |
| Active repos (90d) | 26 | 31 |
| External contributors | 21 | 17 |
| Avg polish | 74 | 57 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 48 | 48 |