Interactive developer hubs that help users succeed with your APIs 🦉
ReadMe vs Sophos
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
ReadMe (Interactive developer hubs that help users succeed with your APIs 🦉) and Sophos both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
ReadMe (rank #257) holds a modest lead over Sophos (rank #510) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (47 vs 37). The gap of 10 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), ReadMe is clearly ahead of Sophos. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), ReadMe is ahead of Sophos. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), ReadMe is ahead of Sophos. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), ReadMe is ahead of Sophos. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), ReadMe is slightly ahead of Sophos.
ReadMe carries 1,824 GitHub stars across 106 public repos, with 26 repositories active in the last 90 days and 21 external contributors on record. Sophos shows 1,438 stars across 84 public repos, 7 active in the last 90 days and 2 external contributors.
ReadMe is the stronger read for anyone weighting code quality. Sophos makes more sense for teams already using its adjacent tools. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | ReadMe | Sophos |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #257 | #510 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 47 | 37 |
| Code | 76 | 33 |
| Education | 79 | 68 |
| Community | 43 | 33 |
| Reach | 26 | 11 |
| Momentum | 48 | 42 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 1,824 | 1,438 |
| Forks | 451 | 432 |
| Public repos | 106 | 84 |
| Active repos (90d) | 26 | 7 |
| External contributors | 21 | 2 |
| Avg polish | 74 | 41 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 48 | 22 |