Interactive developer hubs that help users succeed with your APIs 🦉
ReadMe vs Sumo Logic, Inc.
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
ReadMe (Interactive developer hubs that help users succeed with your APIs 🦉) and Sumo Logic, Inc. both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
ReadMe (rank #257) holds a narrow lead over Sumo Logic, Inc. (rank #401) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (47 vs 41). The gap of 6 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), ReadMe is clearly ahead of Sumo Logic, Inc.. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), ReadMe is clearly ahead of Sumo Logic, Inc.. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), ReadMe is slightly ahead of Sumo Logic, Inc.. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), ReadMe is slightly ahead of Sumo Logic, Inc.. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), ReadMe is ahead of Sumo Logic, Inc..
ReadMe carries 1,824 GitHub stars across 106 public repos, with 26 repositories active in the last 90 days and 21 external contributors on record. Sumo Logic, Inc. shows 1,842 stars across 107 public repos, 27 active in the last 90 days and 14 external contributors.
ReadMe is the stronger read for anyone weighting education. Sumo Logic, Inc. makes more sense for teams already using its adjacent tools. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | ReadMe | Sumo Logic, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #257 | #401 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 47 | 41 |
| Code | 76 | 50 |
| Education | 79 | 47 |
| Community | 43 | 42 |
| Reach | 26 | 23 |
| Momentum | 48 | 37 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 1,824 | 1,842 |
| Forks | 451 | 1,655 |
| Public repos | 106 | 107 |
| Active repos (90d) | 26 | 27 |
| External contributors | 21 | 14 |
| Avg polish | 74 | 57 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 48 | 39 |