ReadMe vs Swiggy

ReadMe (Interactive developer hubs that help users succeed with your APIs 🦉) and Swiggy (Swiggy Public Repos) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

ReadMe (rank #257) holds a modest lead over Swiggy (rank #662) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (47 vs 32). The gap of 15 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), ReadMe is clearly ahead of Swiggy. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), ReadMe is clearly ahead of Swiggy. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), ReadMe is ahead of Swiggy. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), ReadMe is slightly ahead of Swiggy. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), ReadMe is ahead of Swiggy.

ReadMe carries 1,824 GitHub stars across 106 public repos, with 26 repositories active in the last 90 days and 21 external contributors on record. Swiggy shows 314 stars across 22 public repos, 3 active in the last 90 days and 1 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but ReadMe's footprint is roughly 5.8x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

ReadMe is the stronger read for anyone weighting code quality. Swiggy makes more sense for teams already using its adjacent tools. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.