Interactive developer hubs that help users succeed with your APIs 🦉
World-class products that work together to streamline your business. We're hiring!
ReadMe vs Teamwork.com
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
ReadMe (Interactive developer hubs that help users succeed with your APIs 🦉) and Teamwork.com (World-class products that work together to streamline your business. We're hiring!) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Teamwork.com (rank #237) holds a narrow lead over ReadMe (rank #257) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (48 vs 47). The gap of 1 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), ReadMe is ahead of Teamwork.com. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), ReadMe is ahead of Teamwork.com. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), ReadMe is slightly ahead of Teamwork.com. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Teamwork.com is clearly ahead of ReadMe. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), ReadMe is clearly ahead of Teamwork.com.
ReadMe carries 1,824 GitHub stars across 106 public repos, with 26 repositories active in the last 90 days and 21 external contributors on record. Teamwork.com shows 2,108 stars across 123 public repos, 14 active in the last 90 days and 13 external contributors.
ReadMe is the stronger read for anyone weighting momentum. Teamwork.com looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | ReadMe | Teamwork.com |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #257 | #237 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 47 | 48 |
| Code | 76 | 58 |
| Education | 79 | 59 |
| Community | 43 | 37 |
| Reach | 26 | 47 |
| Momentum | 48 | 27 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 1,824 | 2,108 |
| Forks | 451 | 384 |
| Public repos | 106 | 123 |
| Active repos (90d) | 26 | 14 |
| External contributors | 21 | 13 |
| Avg polish | 74 | 62 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 48 | 38 |