ReadMe vs Userlike

ReadMe (Interactive developer hubs that help users succeed with your APIs 🦉) and Userlike both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

ReadMe (rank #257) holds a modest lead over Userlike (rank #569) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (47 vs 35). The gap of 12 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), ReadMe is clearly ahead of Userlike. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Userlike is slightly ahead of ReadMe. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), ReadMe is clearly ahead of Userlike. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), ReadMe is slightly ahead of Userlike. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), ReadMe is clearly ahead of Userlike.

ReadMe carries 1,824 GitHub stars across 106 public repos, with 26 repositories active in the last 90 days and 21 external contributors on record. Userlike shows 38 stars across 14 public repos, 3 active in the last 90 days and 3 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but ReadMe's footprint is roughly 48.0x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

ReadMe is the stronger read for anyone weighting momentum. Userlike looks better where education is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.