ReadMe vs Wrike

ReadMe (Interactive developer hubs that help users succeed with your APIs 🦉) and Wrike (Welcome to the Wrike TechClub open source community. Let's make tech world better together! NB: members must have two-factor auth.) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

ReadMe (rank #257) holds a modest lead over Wrike (rank #602) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (47 vs 34). The gap of 13 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), ReadMe is clearly ahead of Wrike. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), ReadMe is slightly ahead of Wrike. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), ReadMe is clearly ahead of Wrike. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), ReadMe is ahead of Wrike. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), ReadMe is ahead of Wrike.

ReadMe carries 1,824 GitHub stars across 106 public repos, with 26 repositories active in the last 90 days and 21 external contributors on record. Wrike shows 276 stars across 33 public repos, 1 active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but ReadMe's footprint is roughly 6.6x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

ReadMe is the stronger read for anyone weighting community. Wrike makes more sense for teams already using its adjacent tools. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.