Our mission is to make repeat orders easier for everyone.
Recharge, Inc vs Zuora
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Recharge, Inc (Our mission is to make repeat orders easier for everyone.) and Zuora both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Zuora (rank #569) holds a narrow lead over Recharge, Inc (rank #693) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (35 vs 31). The gap of 4 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Recharge, Inc is slightly ahead of Zuora. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Zuora is slightly ahead of Recharge, Inc. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Zuora is clearly ahead of Recharge, Inc. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Zuora is clearly ahead of Recharge, Inc. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Recharge, Inc is clearly ahead of Zuora.
Recharge, Inc carries 9 GitHub stars across 13 public repos, with 2 repositories active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors on record. Zuora shows 10 stars across 21 public repos, 1 active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors.
Recharge, Inc is the stronger read for anyone weighting momentum. Zuora looks better where community is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Recharge, Inc | Zuora |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #693 | #569 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 31 | 35 |
| Code | 36 | 35 |
| Education | 69 | 73 |
| Community | 5 | 33 |
| Reach | 7 | 32 |
| Momentum | 35 | 2 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 9 | 10 |
| Forks | 8 | 38 |
| Public repos | 13 | 21 |
| Active repos (90d) | 2 | 1 |
| External contributors | 0 | 0 |
| Avg polish | 32 | 34 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 33 | 30 |