Recruitee vs tray.ai
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Recruitee and tray.ai both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Recruitee (rank #600) holds a narrow lead over tray.ai (rank #696) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (34 vs 31). The gap of 3 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Recruitee is slightly ahead of tray.ai. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Recruitee is ahead of tray.ai. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), tray.ai is slightly ahead of Recruitee. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Recruitee is clearly ahead of tray.ai. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Recruitee is ahead of tray.ai.
Recruitee carries 411 GitHub stars across 56 public repos, with 1 repositories active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors on record. tray.ai shows 300 stars across 49 public repos, 2 active in the last 90 days and 1 external contributors.
Recruitee is the stronger read for anyone weighting reach. tray.ai looks better where community is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Recruitee | tray.ai |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #600 | #696 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 34 | 31 |
| Code | 46 | 43 |
| Education | 71 | 61 |
| Community | 12 | 14 |
| Reach | 35 | 4 |
| Momentum | 30 | 17 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 411 | 300 |
| Forks | 67 | 109 |
| Public repos | 56 | 49 |
| Active repos (90d) | 1 | 2 |
| External contributors | 0 | 1 |
| Avg polish | 38 | 42 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 33 | 33 |