Recurly vs RingCentral, Inc.
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Recurly and RingCentral, Inc. both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Recurly (rank #317) holds a narrow lead over RingCentral, Inc. (rank #372) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (44 vs 42). The gap of 2 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Recurly is ahead of RingCentral, Inc. . On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Recurly is slightly ahead of RingCentral, Inc. . On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), RingCentral, Inc. is slightly ahead of Recurly. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), RingCentral, Inc. is ahead of Recurly. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Recurly is clearly ahead of RingCentral, Inc. .
Recurly carries 1,564 GitHub stars across 53 public repos, with 26 repositories active in the last 90 days and 5 external contributors on record. RingCentral, Inc. shows 1,659 stars across 184 public repos, 31 active in the last 90 days and 17 external contributors.
Recurly is the stronger read for anyone weighting momentum. RingCentral, Inc. looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Recurly | RingCentral, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #317 | #372 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 44 | 42 |
| Code | 68 | 59 |
| Education | 57 | 52 |
| Community | 34 | 42 |
| Reach | 7 | 23 |
| Momentum | 64 | 39 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 1,564 | 1,659 |
| Forks | 700 | 23,722 |
| Public repos | 53 | 184 |
| Active repos (90d) | 26 | 31 |
| External contributors | 5 | 17 |
| Avg polish | 70 | 57 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 37 | 48 |