Recurly vs Typeform
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Recurly and Typeform both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Typeform (rank #189) holds a narrow lead over Recurly (rank #317) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (50 vs 44). The gap of 6 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Typeform is slightly ahead of Recurly. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Recurly is slightly ahead of Typeform. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Recurly is ahead of Typeform. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Typeform is clearly ahead of Recurly. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Recurly is clearly ahead of Typeform.
Recurly carries 1,564 GitHub stars across 53 public repos, with 26 repositories active in the last 90 days and 5 external contributors on record. Typeform shows 590 stars across 40 public repos, 8 active in the last 90 days and 5 external contributors.
Recurly is the stronger read for anyone weighting momentum. Typeform looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Recurly | Typeform |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #317 | #189 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 44 | 50 |
| Code | 68 | 71 |
| Education | 57 | 51 |
| Community | 34 | 25 |
| Reach | 7 | 43 |
| Momentum | 64 | 31 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 1,564 | 590 |
| Forks | 700 | 254 |
| Public repos | 53 | 40 |
| Active repos (90d) | 26 | 8 |
| External contributors | 5 | 5 |
| Avg polish | 70 | 75 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 37 | 38 |