Remote helps with international payroll, benefits, taxes, stock options, and compliance for businesses big and small!
Remote vs UXPin
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Remote (Remote helps with international payroll, benefits, taxes, stock options, and compliance for businesses big and small!) and UXPin (The Full-Stack UX Design Platform) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Remote (rank #278) holds a modest lead over UXPin (rank #569) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (46 vs 35). The gap of 11 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Remote is clearly ahead of UXPin. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Remote is ahead of UXPin. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Remote is clearly ahead of UXPin. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), UXPin is ahead of Remote. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Remote is ahead of UXPin.
Remote carries 811 GitHub stars across 51 public repos, with 17 repositories active in the last 90 days and 21 external contributors on record. UXPin shows 879 stars across 25 public repos, 3 active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors.
Remote is the stronger read for anyone weighting code quality. UXPin looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Remote | UXPin |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #278 | #569 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 46 | 35 |
| Code | 51 | 30 |
| Education | 80 | 66 |
| Community | 34 | 13 |
| Reach | 20 | 39 |
| Momentum | 43 | 34 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 811 | 879 |
| Forks | 97 | 117 |
| Public repos | 51 | 25 |
| Active repos (90d) | 17 | 3 |
| External contributors | 21 | 0 |
| Avg polish | 44 | 23 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 40 | 21 |