RingCentral, Inc. vs Sage
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
RingCentral, Inc. and Sage both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
RingCentral, Inc. (rank #372) holds a modest lead over Sage (rank #625) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (42 vs 33). The gap of 9 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), RingCentral, Inc. is slightly ahead of Sage. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), RingCentral, Inc. is slightly ahead of Sage. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), RingCentral, Inc. is clearly ahead of Sage.
RingCentral, Inc. carries 1,659 GitHub stars across 184 public repos, with 31 repositories active in the last 90 days and 17 external contributors on record. Sage shows 2,180 stars across 122 public repos, 6 active in the last 90 days and 22 external contributors.
RingCentral, Inc. is the stronger read for anyone weighting momentum. Sage makes more sense for teams already using its adjacent tools. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | RingCentral, Inc. | Sage |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #372 | #625 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 42 | 33 |
| Code | 59 | 56 |
| Education | 52 | 52 |
| Community | 42 | 34 |
| Reach | 23 | 23 |
| Momentum | 39 | 12 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 1,659 | 2,180 |
| Forks | 23,722 | 430 |
| Public repos | 184 | 122 |
| Active repos (90d) | 31 | 6 |
| External contributors | 17 | 22 |
| Avg polish | 57 | 52 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 48 | 38 |