RingCentral, Inc. vs sendinblue (now Brevo)
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
RingCentral, Inc. and sendinblue (now Brevo) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
RingCentral, Inc. and sendinblue (now Brevo) sit at essentially the same overall ecosystem score (42), which is unusual and worth reading through the pillars below.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), RingCentral, Inc. is ahead of sendinblue (now Brevo). On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), sendinblue (now Brevo) is clearly ahead of RingCentral, Inc. . On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), RingCentral, Inc. is clearly ahead of sendinblue (now Brevo). On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), sendinblue (now Brevo) is slightly ahead of RingCentral, Inc. . On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), RingCentral, Inc. is clearly ahead of sendinblue (now Brevo).
RingCentral, Inc. carries 1,659 GitHub stars across 184 public repos, with 31 repositories active in the last 90 days and 17 external contributors on record. sendinblue (now Brevo) shows 653 stars across 37 public repos, 0 active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors.
RingCentral, Inc. is the stronger read for anyone weighting momentum. sendinblue (now Brevo) looks better where education is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | RingCentral, Inc. | sendinblue (now Brevo) |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #372 | #372 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 42 | 42 |
| Code | 59 | 47 |
| Education | 52 | 76 |
| Community | 42 | 15 |
| Reach | 23 | 31 |
| Momentum | 39 | 0 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 1,659 | 653 |
| Forks | 23,722 | 328 |
| Public repos | 184 | 37 |
| Active repos (90d) | 31 | 0 |
| External contributors | 17 | 0 |
| Avg polish | 57 | 42 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 48 | 40 |