RingCentral, Inc. vs Sprout Social
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
RingCentral, Inc. and Sprout Social both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
RingCentral, Inc. (rank #372) holds a narrow lead over Sprout Social (rank #401) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (42 vs 41). The gap of 1 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), RingCentral, Inc. is ahead of Sprout Social. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), RingCentral, Inc. is clearly ahead of Sprout Social. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Sprout Social is ahead of RingCentral, Inc. . On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Sprout Social is clearly ahead of RingCentral, Inc. .
RingCentral, Inc. carries 1,659 GitHub stars across 184 public repos, with 31 repositories active in the last 90 days and 17 external contributors on record. Sprout Social shows 313 stars across 68 public repos, 4 active in the last 90 days and 3 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but RingCentral, Inc. 's footprint is roughly 5.3x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.
RingCentral, Inc. is the stronger read for anyone weighting community. Sprout Social looks better where momentum is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | RingCentral, Inc. | Sprout Social |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #372 | #401 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 42 | 41 |
| Code | 59 | 48 |
| Education | 52 | 52 |
| Community | 42 | 17 |
| Reach | 23 | 41 |
| Momentum | 39 | 60 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 1,659 | 313 |
| Forks | 23,722 | 122 |
| Public repos | 184 | 68 |
| Active repos (90d) | 31 | 4 |
| External contributors | 17 | 3 |
| Avg polish | 57 | 47 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 48 | 30 |