World-class products that work together to streamline your business. We're hiring!
Sage vs Teamwork.com
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Sage and Teamwork.com (World-class products that work together to streamline your business. We're hiring!) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Teamwork.com (rank #237) holds a modest lead over Sage (rank #625) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (48 vs 33). The gap of 15 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Teamwork.com is slightly ahead of Sage. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Teamwork.com is slightly ahead of Sage. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Teamwork.com is slightly ahead of Sage. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Teamwork.com is clearly ahead of Sage. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Teamwork.com is ahead of Sage.
Sage carries 2,180 GitHub stars across 122 public repos, with 6 repositories active in the last 90 days and 22 external contributors on record. Teamwork.com shows 2,108 stars across 123 public repos, 14 active in the last 90 days and 13 external contributors.
Sage is worth a look for teams already invested in its stack. Teamwork.com looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Sage | Teamwork.com |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #625 | #237 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 33 | 48 |
| Code | 56 | 58 |
| Education | 52 | 59 |
| Community | 34 | 37 |
| Reach | 23 | 47 |
| Momentum | 12 | 27 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 2,180 | 2,108 |
| Forks | 430 | 384 |
| Public repos | 122 | 123 |
| Active repos (90d) | 6 | 14 |
| External contributors | 22 | 13 |
| Avg polish | 52 | 62 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 38 | 38 |