Building the internet's open library of freely usable visuals. Join us 👫
Sage vs Unsplash
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Sage and Unsplash (Building the internet's open library of freely usable visuals. Join us 👫) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Unsplash (rank #338) holds a modest lead over Sage (rank #625) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (43 vs 33). The gap of 10 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Unsplash is ahead of Sage. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Sage is slightly ahead of Unsplash. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Unsplash is ahead of Sage. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Unsplash is clearly ahead of Sage.
Sage carries 2,180 GitHub stars across 122 public repos, with 6 repositories active in the last 90 days and 22 external contributors on record. Unsplash shows 9,930 stars across 63 public repos, 3 active in the last 90 days and 3 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Unsplash's footprint is roughly 4.6x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.
Sage is the stronger read for anyone weighting community. Unsplash looks better where momentum is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Sage | Unsplash |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #625 | #338 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 33 | 43 |
| Code | 56 | 56 |
| Education | 52 | 72 |
| Community | 34 | 33 |
| Reach | 23 | 40 |
| Momentum | 12 | 34 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 2,180 | 9,930 |
| Forks | 430 | 829 |
| Public repos | 122 | 63 |
| Active repos (90d) | 6 | 3 |
| External contributors | 22 | 3 |
| Avg polish | 52 | 60 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 38 | 38 |