Sardine vs Sonos, Inc.
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Sardine and Sonos, Inc. (The Wireless Hi-Fi system) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Sonos, Inc. (rank #401) holds a narrow lead over Sardine (rank #569) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (41 vs 35). The gap of 6 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Sonos, Inc. is ahead of Sardine. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Sardine is slightly ahead of Sonos, Inc.. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Sonos, Inc. is ahead of Sardine. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Sardine is slightly ahead of Sonos, Inc.. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Sardine is slightly ahead of Sonos, Inc..
Sardine carries 19 GitHub stars across 55 public repos, with 5 repositories active in the last 90 days and 5 external contributors on record. Sonos, Inc. shows 4,693 stars across 28 public repos, 4 active in the last 90 days and 12 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Sonos, Inc.'s footprint is roughly 247.0x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.
Sardine is the stronger read for anyone weighting reach. Sonos, Inc. looks better where community is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Sardine | Sonos, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #569 | #401 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 35 | 41 |
| Code | 36 | 48 |
| Education | 66 | 63 |
| Community | 25 | 41 |
| Reach | 44 | 37 |
| Momentum | 9 | 8 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 19 | 4,693 |
| Forks | 8 | 609 |
| Public repos | 55 | 28 |
| Active repos (90d) | 5 | 4 |
| External contributors | 5 | 12 |
| Avg polish | 34 | 50 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 31 | 35 |