We do love open source and have an opportunity to make it better from now.
Semrush vs Thomson Reuters
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Semrush (We do love open source and have an opportunity to make it better from now.) and Thomson Reuters both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Semrush (rank #317) holds a modest lead over Thomson Reuters (rank #625) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (44 vs 33). The gap of 11 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Thomson Reuters is slightly ahead of Semrush. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Semrush is ahead of Thomson Reuters. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Thomson Reuters is ahead of Semrush. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Semrush is clearly ahead of Thomson Reuters.
Semrush carries 454 GitHub stars across 11 public repos, with 2 repositories active in the last 90 days and 7 external contributors on record. Thomson Reuters shows 436 stars across 143 public repos, 8 active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors.
Semrush is the stronger read for anyone weighting momentum. Thomson Reuters looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Semrush | Thomson Reuters |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #317 | #625 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 44 | 33 |
| Code | 44 | 44 |
| Education | 65 | 66 |
| Community | 36 | 21 |
| Reach | 35 | 45 |
| Momentum | 37 | 16 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 454 | 436 |
| Forks | 124 | 166 |
| Public repos | 11 | 143 |
| Active repos (90d) | 2 | 8 |
| External contributors | 7 | 0 |
| Avg polish | 48 | 46 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 32 | 30 |