We do love open source and have an opportunity to make it better from now.
Semrush vs Workable
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Semrush (We do love open source and have an opportunity to make it better from now.) and Workable both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Semrush (rank #317) holds a modest lead over Workable (rank #569) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (44 vs 35). The gap of 9 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Workable is slightly ahead of Semrush. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Semrush is ahead of Workable. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Semrush is ahead of Workable. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Workable is slightly ahead of Semrush. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Semrush is slightly ahead of Workable.
Semrush carries 454 GitHub stars across 11 public repos, with 2 repositories active in the last 90 days and 7 external contributors on record. Workable shows 785 stars across 96 public repos, 5 active in the last 90 days and 5 external contributors.
Semrush is the stronger read for anyone weighting community. Workable looks better where code quality is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Semrush | Workable |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #317 | #569 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 44 | 35 |
| Code | 44 | 51 |
| Education | 65 | 56 |
| Community | 36 | 24 |
| Reach | 35 | 41 |
| Momentum | 37 | 30 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 454 | 785 |
| Forks | 124 | 135 |
| Public repos | 11 | 96 |
| Active repos (90d) | 2 | 5 |
| External contributors | 7 | 5 |
| Avg polish | 48 | 46 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 32 | 49 |