sendinblue (now Brevo) vs Zammad

sendinblue (now Brevo) and Zammad both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Zammad (rank #152) holds a modest lead over sendinblue (now Brevo) (rank #372) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (52 vs 42). The gap of 10 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Zammad is ahead of sendinblue (now Brevo). On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), sendinblue (now Brevo) is slightly ahead of Zammad. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Zammad is clearly ahead of sendinblue (now Brevo). On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), sendinblue (now Brevo) is clearly ahead of Zammad. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Zammad is clearly ahead of sendinblue (now Brevo).

sendinblue (now Brevo) carries 653 GitHub stars across 37 public repos, with 0 repositories active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors on record. Zammad shows 6,394 stars across 11 public repos, 9 active in the last 90 days and 27 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Zammad's footprint is roughly 9.8x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

sendinblue (now Brevo) is the stronger read for anyone weighting reach. Zammad looks better where community is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.