Skyscanner vs Sophos

Skyscanner and Sophos both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Skyscanner (rank #209) holds a modest lead over Sophos (rank #510) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (49 vs 37). The gap of 12 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Skyscanner is clearly ahead of Sophos. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Skyscanner is slightly ahead of Sophos. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Skyscanner is slightly ahead of Sophos. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Skyscanner is clearly ahead of Sophos. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Sophos is slightly ahead of Skyscanner.

Skyscanner carries 8,167 GitHub stars across 86 public repos, with 18 repositories active in the last 90 days and 39 external contributors on record. Sophos shows 1,438 stars across 84 public repos, 7 active in the last 90 days and 2 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Skyscanner's footprint is roughly 5.7x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

Skyscanner is the stronger read for anyone weighting code quality. Sophos looks better where momentum is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.