Skyscanner vs Teamwork.com

Skyscanner and Teamwork.com (World-class products that work together to streamline your business. We're hiring!) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Skyscanner (rank #209) holds a narrow lead over Teamwork.com (rank #237) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (49 vs 48). The gap of 1 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Skyscanner is ahead of Teamwork.com. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Skyscanner is ahead of Teamwork.com. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Skyscanner is slightly ahead of Teamwork.com. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Teamwork.com is ahead of Skyscanner. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Skyscanner is ahead of Teamwork.com.

Skyscanner carries 8,167 GitHub stars across 86 public repos, with 18 repositories active in the last 90 days and 39 external contributors on record. Teamwork.com shows 2,108 stars across 123 public repos, 14 active in the last 90 days and 13 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Skyscanner's footprint is roughly 3.9x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

Skyscanner is the stronger read for anyone weighting momentum. Teamwork.com looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.