Skyscanner vs Typeform

Skyscanner and Typeform both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Typeform (rank #189) holds a narrow lead over Skyscanner (rank #209) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (50 vs 49). The gap of 1 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Typeform is slightly ahead of Skyscanner. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Skyscanner is clearly ahead of Typeform. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Skyscanner is ahead of Typeform. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Typeform is ahead of Skyscanner. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Skyscanner is ahead of Typeform.

Skyscanner carries 8,167 GitHub stars across 86 public repos, with 18 repositories active in the last 90 days and 39 external contributors on record. Typeform shows 590 stars across 40 public repos, 8 active in the last 90 days and 5 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Skyscanner's footprint is roughly 13.8x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

Skyscanner is the stronger read for anyone weighting education. Typeform looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.