Skyscanner vs Unbounce

Skyscanner and Unbounce both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Skyscanner (rank #209) holds a modest lead over Unbounce (rank #569) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (49 vs 35). The gap of 14 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Skyscanner is ahead of Unbounce. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Skyscanner is slightly ahead of Unbounce. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Skyscanner is clearly ahead of Unbounce. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Unbounce is slightly ahead of Skyscanner. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Skyscanner is ahead of Unbounce.

Skyscanner carries 8,167 GitHub stars across 86 public repos, with 18 repositories active in the last 90 days and 39 external contributors on record. Unbounce shows 179 stars across 35 public repos, 6 active in the last 90 days and 3 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Skyscanner's footprint is roughly 45.6x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

Skyscanner is the stronger read for anyone weighting community. Unbounce looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.