Skyscanner vs Workable

Skyscanner and Workable both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Skyscanner (rank #209) holds a modest lead over Workable (rank #569) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (49 vs 35). The gap of 14 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Skyscanner is ahead of Workable. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Skyscanner is ahead of Workable. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Skyscanner is ahead of Workable. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Workable is ahead of Skyscanner. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Skyscanner is ahead of Workable.

Skyscanner carries 8,167 GitHub stars across 86 public repos, with 18 repositories active in the last 90 days and 39 external contributors on record. Workable shows 785 stars across 96 public repos, 5 active in the last 90 days and 5 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Skyscanner's footprint is roughly 10.4x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

Skyscanner is the stronger read for anyone weighting code quality. Workable looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.